What is prosecution history estoppel?

What is prosecution history estoppel? Prosecution history estoppel is the principle that statements used in communications between a patent attorney and a patent Examiner at the USPTO can and will be used against an Applicant if a patent is litigated. Patent history estoppel can be used against an Applicant to disavow claim scope through the [...]

By |2013-09-11T15:43:19-05:00September 11th, 2013|Blog|Comments Off on What is prosecution history estoppel?

COOPER NOTIFICATION, INC. v. TWITTER, INC.

Non-parallel claim scope can create patent production history, as well as other trouble when the patent is litigated. In this case Cooper Notification, Inc. (Cooper) appeals a decision from US District court holding that Twitter  and other defendants did not infringe claims 12-18 of U.S. Patent 7,409,428. Cooper is the owner of the ‘428 patent [...]

By |2013-09-11T10:31:50-05:00September 11th, 2013|Patent Attorney Takeaways|Comments Off on COOPER NOTIFICATION, INC. v. TWITTER, INC.

Should You File a Provisional Patent Application Before Kickstarter?

How do I protect my idea before obtaining funding on Kickstarter? Kickstarter or other crowd funding platforms for creative and innovative projections and inventions are great resources for start-ups. The main resource for crow funding platforms, such as Kickstarter, is to obtain initial funding for your innovations. However, Kickstarter can also be used as a [...]

By |2013-09-10T20:13:58-05:00September 10th, 2013|Blog|Comments Off on Should You File a Provisional Patent Application Before Kickstarter?

How do I Overcome a Design Choice Rejection in an Office Action

Design choice rejections are rejections that an Examiner at the USPTO can make if the claimed invention merely includes “design choices” that are different from the prior art. However, even minor differences between acclaimed invention and prior art may be patentable. Patent law has held that in a proper obviousness determine, "whether the changes from [...]

By |2013-09-08T21:41:55-05:00September 8th, 2013|Blog|Comments Off on How do I Overcome a Design Choice Rejection in an Office Action

COMAPER CORPORATION v. ANTEC, INC.

Comaper Corporation (hereinafter “Comaper”) v. Antec  is a case dealing with the Federal Circuit reversing the District Court’s JMOL.     Comaper is the owner of U.S. Patent No. 5,955,955  that is directed towards computer cooling devices. A representative claim at issue is reproduced below: 1. A cooling device for a computer, said computer having [...]

By |2013-09-08T20:22:26-05:00September 8th, 2013|Patent Attorney Takeaways|Comments Off on COMAPER CORPORATION v. ANTEC, INC.

ACCENTURE GLOBAL SERVICES v. GUIDEWIRE SOFTWARE INC.

This case is the latest case in the debate regarding if software related patents are eligible subject matter under the Federal Circuit. In this case, Accenture is the holder of U.S. patent number 7,013,284, which is directed towards systems that generate and organize insurance-related tasks. The claims in the ‘284 patent include claims with various [...]

By |2013-09-07T18:53:33-05:00September 7th, 2013|Patent Attorney Takeaways|Comments Off on ACCENTURE GLOBAL SERVICES v. GUIDEWIRE SOFTWARE INC.

TRADING TECHNOLOGIES V. OPEN E CRY – Claim Construction v Invalidity

The lesson to be learned in this case is that claim construction and invalidity based on the written description are separate issues that have their own tests, and serve different purposes. In this case, Trading Technologies owns a family of patents that are related to presenting interfaces to users associated with commodities exchanges, think stock [...]

By |2013-09-05T10:59:32-05:00September 5th, 2013|Patent Attorney Takeaways|Comments Off on TRADING TECHNOLOGIES V. OPEN E CRY – Claim Construction v Invalidity

Should my start-up use LEGAL ZOOM to file a patent application?

Legalzoom or other legal companies that provide forms, templates, and other best practices documents that are a great resource for individuals and companies who desire legal protection at cheaper rates. In some circumstances, I do recommend people use Legalzoom for their legal needs, such as if they desire to have a simple will drafted, prenuptial [...]

By |2013-09-04T14:41:30-05:00September 4th, 2013|Blog|Comments Off on Should my start-up use LEGAL ZOOM to file a patent application?
Go to Top