A TRADEMARK ATTORNEY’S REVIEW OF IN RE SIMON SHIAO TAM

In this case, Mr. Simon Shiao Tam names his band “THE SLANTS” to make a statement about racial and cultural issues in this country. Section 2(a) of the Lanham acts bars the Trademark Office from registering scandalous, immoral, or disparaging marks.  However, the government cannot refuse to register disparaging marks because it disapproves of the [...]

By |2016-12-27T15:29:06-06:00January 29th, 2016|Blog|Comments Off on A TRADEMARK ATTORNEY’S REVIEW OF IN RE SIMON SHIAO TAM

A Houston Patent Attorney’s Review of: PFIZER INC. v. LEE

Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) is utilized by the Patent Office so that an inventor’s patent protection is not limited by delays caused by the Patent Office. The Patent Term Guarantee Act (“the Act”), 35 U.S.C. § 154(b), provides for the restoration of patent term in three circumstances: (i) an “A-Delay,” which awards PTA for delays [...]

By |2016-01-28T11:02:37-06:00January 28th, 2016|Blog, Uncategorized|Comments Off on A Houston Patent Attorney’s Review of: PFIZER INC. v. LEE

A Houston Patent Attorney’s Review of Lumen View Technology vs. FINDTHEBEST.COM, INC.

In this case, Lumen sued FINDTHEBEST.COM for infringing U.S Patent 8,069,073. The ‘073 patent had claims that were directed towards facilitating procurement of delivery of products or services involving multiple classes of parties. All of the claims were directed towards a computer implemented method. Based on the pleadings, the judge in the Southern District of [...]

By |2016-01-26T11:32:48-06:00January 26th, 2016|Blog|Comments Off on A Houston Patent Attorney’s Review of Lumen View Technology vs. FINDTHEBEST.COM, INC.

A Houston Patent Attorneys review of: ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, INC. v. COVIDIEN LP

The main issue presented in Ethicon vs. Coviden is whether 35 U.S.C. § 314(d) precludes the federal circuit from hearing Ethicon’s challenge to the authority of the Board of the Patent office to render a final decision. The statute at issue states that the Director may not authorize an inter partes review to be instituted [...]

By |2016-01-21T16:17:55-06:00January 21st, 2016|Blog|Comments Off on A Houston Patent Attorneys review of: ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, INC. v. COVIDIEN LP

BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS, LLC v PUGET BIOVENTURES

The issues at hand in this case deal with procedural issues when dealing with infringement lawsuits at the federal level, while there is a pending appeal with the USPTO. Before this case, Puget Bioventures brought suit against Biomet alleging infringement of US Patent Number 7,344,541, which expired on December 25, 2015. After filing the suit, [...]

By |2016-01-21T10:49:40-06:00January 21st, 2016|Blog|Comments Off on BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS, LLC v PUGET BIOVENTURES
Go to Top