In this case, Mr. Simon Shiao Tam names his band “THE SLANTS” to make a statement about racial and cultural issues in this country. Section 2(a) of the Lanham acts bars the Trademark Office from registering scandalous, immoral, or disparaging marks.  However, the government cannot refuse to register disparaging marks because it disapproves of the [...]

In this case, Lumen sued FINDTHEBEST.COM for infringing U.S Patent 8,069,073. The ‘073 patent had claims that were directed towards facilitating procurement of delivery of products or services involving multiple classes of parties. All of the claims were directed towards a computer implemented method. Based on the pleadings, the judge in the Southern District of [...]

The main issue presented in Ethicon vs. Coviden is whether 35 U.S.C. § 314(d) precludes the federal circuit from hearing Ethicon’s challenge to the authority of the Board of the Patent office to render a final decision. The statute at issue states that the Director may not authorize an inter partes review to be instituted [...]

The issues at hand in this case deal with procedural issues when dealing with infringement lawsuits at the federal level, while there is a pending appeal with the USPTO. Before this case, Puget Bioventures brought suit against Biomet alleging infringement of US Patent Number 7,344,541, which expired on December 25, 2015. After filing the suit, [...]

Alice Corps. is the most recent famous case decided by the Supreme Court related with software patent eligibility.  The claims in Alice Corps were directed to hedging risks in commodities trading, wherein the methods of hedging risks were somewhat known in the field. Citing Mayo, the Supreme Court applied the two prong test for an [...]